More than 50 years ago, GM's then President Charles Wilson reportedly said, "What's good for General Motors is good for the country." If so, he must have meant that the opposite was equally true.
Let's fast forward to today and look at the financial difficulties both GM and the city Detroit are having.
For that matter, how about noticing the similarities of Detroit to the cities of Chicago and L.A., as well as the states of Michigan, Illinois and California? The source of their funds is the private sector, and that's case with all governments. Accordingly, if the private sector is sick, so is the government.
And that, my friends, is why government bailouts can't possibly save GM or anybody else for that matter. It's always the other way around.
For example, where do these cities and states get the money to operate? And if the source of those funds dries up, where do they turn for help? And if they turn to the federal government, what's the source of our governmnt's funds? That brings us directly back to private sector companies and their success. That's all there is to it.
To repeat, the source of government funds, whether the government be that of a city, state or the national government, is the private sector. Therefore, the health of private sector companies ultimately determines the health of our city, state and federal governments. They're the financial engine and government is the caboose.
Thus, no government (city, state or federal) can bailout a company, and neither can it bailout itself.
And to finish the point, public and private sector unions are not the sources of their own funds either.
Motown's Mental Breakdown is subtitled 'As unions and the city council resist reforms, bankruptcy looms:'
"The political gospel according to Democrats is that
the auto bailout saved Detroit. If only it were so. Alas, costly labor
agreements have driven Motown like GM and Chrysler to disrepair. Perhaps the
only fix now is to let Detroit go bankrupt.
Michigan lawmakers have kept Detroit on life support for the past six months
and may need to do so indefinitely barring a miraculous economic recovery. The
city will run out of cash this month unless the state releases $30 million in
bond proceeds, which are being held in escrow under a consent agreement that
council members reluctantly approved in April. The rescue package ties $137
million in state aid to reforms and lets Mayor Dave Bing redo labor
The city has already drawn $40 million from the state drip and may soon be
cut off since council members last month rejected a contract for a legal firm to
advise the mayor, a condition of further aid. . . .
While the council is digging Detroit's grave, Mr. Bing is performing triage.
The Democratic mayor has slashed wages across the board by 10%; increased health
premiums and co-pays; reduced current-worker pensions and suspended retirees'
2.25% cost-of-living raises. This quadruple bypass operation will save about $60
million this year, but the city will still likely end the fiscal year next June
$50 million in the red.
Meanwhile, third-party actuaries are pegging the city's retirement
liabilities at $11 billion, nearly twice as much as the city has estimated.
Detroit will spend $160 million this year and $135 million in 2013 on retiree
benefits even after Mr. Bing's labor reforms are phased in. Some of the problem
is demographic and has been exacerbated by defined-benefit pensions that let
workers retire in their 40s. Many retirees living into their 80s are drawing
benefits for nearly twice as long as they work.
The mayor has also floated raising the retirement age and moving new hires to
401(k)-style plans as the state did in 1997. He's even put the nuclear
option—freezing pensions for all workers—on the table. Federal law requires
private employers to do this if their pension funds become insolvent, but there
are no such diktats for local governments.
Another idea is outsourcing operations to private companies. According to the
Mackinac Center for Public Policy, the city could save about $110 million
annually by contracting out its bus system, garbage collection and water
management. Selling its electrical system to an investor-owned utility could
raise $300 million to $500 million. Unions oppose all of the above.
Egged on by the city council, the unions have also sued to block the consent
agreement and the mayor's labor reforms. State courts threw out their lawsuits
this summer, but the unions hope that voters' November repeal of a state
emergency manager law, which provides the framework for the consent agreement,
will also void the reforms.
And make no mistake, Detroit is on its deathbed. Its unemployment rate is
nearly twice as high as its surrounding metropolitan region. It has the highest
violent crime rate of any major city in part because its police force has been
stripped to pay for retirement bills while two-thirds of its street lights are
broken. Its schools are among America's worst. The city has lost a quarter of
its population over the last decade, and its abandoned lots cover more acreage
If the council wants to bolt from its state rehab program, the only way to
rescue Detroit may be through an orderly bankruptcy (i.e., not politically
negotiated) that restructures its $2.5 billion in general fund-backed debt and
$11 billion in retirement obligations. Detroit would be the largest city to date
to file for bankruptcy. Its restructuring could drag on for several years, slash
pensions for many retirees and impair the city's ability to borrow for decades.
But at the very least, (filing for bankruptcy) would provide an instructive lesson for other
chronically insolvent cities like Chicago and Los Angeles that have delayed
reforms because they believe they're too big to fail."
Who's too big to fail? Nobody.
The government's bailout of GM was in effect no bailout at all. Now Detroit needs a bailout. And perhaps next up will be Michigan.
Our governments don't produce wealth. Neither do our unions.
Our national wealth is only created by private sector participants competing effectively in global markets.
And without successful private sector companies competing successfully, there's no chance to maintain a public sector that behaves as it did when the private sector was thriving.
Let's take one simple, albeit painful, example. Public sector pension benefits which are paid to recipients for twice as long as the employee worked are unsustainable, even in the best of times. And these aren't the best of times.
And that's true regardless of whether private or public sector employees are the pension recipients.
But if, as and when the private sector goodies are gone, the public sector will follow closely behind.
What's so hard to understand about that?
Is GM saved? Not a chance?
So can Detroit be saved? Not a chance.
Chicago, L.A. and other cities? Well, that depends on what happens down the road.
We'll stay tuned.