The federal government knows best gang doesn't exactly have a habit of leveling with the American people. We the People have come to learn that over time.
As an example, government officials acknowledge ~$16 trillion in debt but choose not to talk about the other $100 trillion in unfunded entitlements.
At the state and local levels, however, there's not even an acknowledgement of the approximately $7.3 trillion in debt that for the most part has never been approved by taxpayers. Instead we all pretend that the various states and local municipalities balance their budgets each year. If that's the case, where did the $7.3 trillion liability originate?
So in the battle of the bad actors, who's worse? Is it the national politicians or is it the local and state crew? Well, it looks very much like a tie to me. They both suck in their fiduciary roles as our elected "public servants." Read on and see why that's the case.
The Debt Bomb That Taxpayers Won't See Coming is subtitled 'State and local government owe $7.3 trillion in promises they've made that were never approved by taxpayers:'
"Earlier this month, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Illinois
officials with making misleading statements to bond investors about the state's
pension system. The agency detailed a long list of deceptive practices including
failure to tell investors that the system was so underfunded that it risked
Illinois taxpayers, as well as the holders of its debt, will ultimately bear
the burden of the officials' misdeeds. But there is nothing unique about the
Prairie State. For years, elected officials in states and municipalities across
the country have been imprudently piling up obligations that are imposing
serious strains on budgets, prompting higher taxes and cutbacks in services.
In January, city officials in Sacramento, California's capital, reported . . . that Sacramento had racked up some $2
billion in obligations (mostly pensions and retiree health care). All this for a
municipality of 477,000 residents with an annual general fund budget of just
$366 million. . . .
Servicing its debt
in years to come will only add more woe, especially given the intractability of
public unions. The budget report noted that "While reducing staff is clearly not
the preferred method for reducing costs, the city has a very limited ability to
reduce the cost of labor absent cooperation from the city's employee
According to studies by the Pew Center on the States, states and the biggest
cities have made nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars in promises to pay
for retiree health-care insurance. Yet governments have set aside only about 5%
of the money they'll need to pay for these promises.
This year a Chicago city commission reported that retiree health-care
expenditures would soar from $109 million in this year's budget to $541 million
in a decade. After concluding that the expenditures were unaffordable, one
member of the commission proposed that retirees be required to sign on to the
Illinois Health Insurance Exchange being created under President Obama's
Affordable Care Act. Health insurance would be cheaper if it is subsidized by
the federal government.
A December report by the States Project, a joint venture of Harvard's
Institute of Politics and the University of Pennsylvania's Fels Institute of
Government, estimated that state and local governments now owe in sum a
staggering $7.3 trillion. Incredibly, the vast majority of this debt has never
been approved by taxpayers, who are often unaware of the extent of their
Most state constitutions and many municipal charters limit borrowing and
mandate voter approval. No matter. Politicians evade the limits, issuing
billions of dollars in municipal offerings never approved by voters, sometimes
with disastrous consequences. Courts have rubber-stamped many of these schemes.
The debt incurred by New Jersey for school projects is a case in point. In
2001, legislators in Trenton hatched a scheme to borrow a shocking $8.6 billion
for refurbishing school buildings. The reaction to their plan in the press and
among taxpayer groups was so negative that the politicians knew that voters
would never approve it. So the legislature created an independent borrowing
authority. Since it, and not taxpayers, would take on the debt, politicians
claimed that there was no need for voters' consent. . . .
New Jersey's Schools Construction Corp. quickly squandered half of the money
on patronage and inefficient construction practices, so in 2005 the state
borrowed another $3.9 billion. All of the debt is being repaid by taxpayers. The
authority, which was dissolved several years ago, had no revenues of its own.
Next door, in New York, a scant 5% of the Empire State's $63 billion in
outstanding debt has ever been authorized by voters, according to the state
comptroller. The rest has been engineered through independent authorities such
as the Transitional Finance Authority.
These authorities are designed to circumvent voters. Of the seven bond
offerings that have gone before New York voters in the past 25 years, four have
been defeated. But thanks to unsanctioned debt, New Yorkers bear the
second-highest per capita debt burden in the nation, $3,258, according to a
January report by the state comptroller. New Jersey is No. 1, at $3,964.
To prevent the pile-up of hidden debt, taxpayers need to spearhead a revolt
that will narrow the ability of officials to mortgage their future. Any such
revolt will first of all seek an end to government sponsored defined-benefit
pension plans, through which politicians promise benefits years hence to current
employees in a manner that potentially leaves taxpayers on the hook for
unlimited liabilities. Simpler, defined-contribution plans featuring individual
retirement accounts would make government pension systems less expensive and
their accounting more transparent.
Similarly, reformers will have to rein in borrowing by independent
authorities and other government entities created to circumvent current debt
limits. No state or municipality should be allowed to issue any debt for which
taxpayers are ultimately liable without voter approval.
Without such reforms, many states risk becoming like Illinois, where a $7 billion tax increase in 2011 was largely gobbled up by rising
pension costs, leaving the state with a $9 billion backlog of unpaid bills and
the prospect of new taxes to pay off its $271 billion in debt. This is a future
in which rising taxes don't provide citizens new services but merely go to pay
off hidden debts."
Whatever happened to the idea of representative democracy? Self government? No taxation without representation?
Well, for one thing, public sector unions happened. For another, the Democratic Party and those public sector unions have been scratching each other's back for a long time now. And for a third, taxpayers haven't been paying any attention to the bills of the future being incurred by the government knows best gang in the present and on their 'behalf.'
So it's not just public sector pensions that put taxpayers on the 'ultimate financial hook.' Many infrastructure projects such as bridges, stadiums, sewers, public schools, government buildings and numerous other forms of 'creatively' debt financed public infrastructure as well, will end up in the taxpayers' lap down the road.
And sadly, many of those future paying taxpayers won't have had any say in the matter. Come to think of it, neither will many of their predecessors, aka current taxpayers.
Government debt and politics both suck. At all levels.
Wouldn't it be appropriate for We the People to insist on a whole lot greater transparency and accountability since it's our money, and that of our kids and grandkids, that's being wasted -- er -- invested by our 'public servants?'
That's my take.