Ready for another sterling example of government knows best politicians wasting taxpayer money under the guise of helping the poor get an education?
This one concerns the proliferation of Pell Grants since the program's inception in 1972. And if the program is being administered properly and in accordance with its intent, approximately 60% of today's college students are among the poor. And Pell Grants account for 50% of the Department of Education's budget.
According to the federal government's official program description, "The Federal Pell Grant Program provides need-based grants to low-income . . . students . . . ." However, Pell Grants Flunk Out begs to differ and tells a much different story about how the program actually works:
" . . . Washington is having a
bit more trouble getting its mind around the expanding debacle of
helping college students pay for their education.
According to a study released last
week by Jenna Robinson and Duke Cheston from the Pope Center for Higher
Education, the federal Pell Grant program is starting to look like a
runaway train. At $36 billion a year in 2009-2010, it took up half the
Department of Education budget and is the federal government's single
biggest expense on higher education. This is what President Obama calls
an "investment." The returns, the report says, have not been strong.
Started in 1972 to help poor kids pay for college, Pell Grants are
now so broad that more than half of all undergrads benefit. In the
2009-2010 school year (the most recent data available), 60% of all
college students received a grant—a total of 9.6 million students.
Between 2008 and 2010, the number of Pell grantees increased by almost
50%, roughly doubling taxpayer cost.
The Obama Administration has increased the maximum grant awarded to
students to $5,550 since 2010 from $4,731 per year in 2008. Some
students engage in their own creative accounting to qualify, declaring
financial independence from their families to avoid getting nixed by
means-testing. A 2009 study by Christina Chang Wei and Laura Horn found
that 60% of Pell Grant recipients were "financially independent" of
their parents, compared with 34% of non-recipients.
The program is set up in other ways that invite abuse. Because the
amount of a Pell Grant for full-time study depends on both a student's
financial straits and the cost to attend school, better-off students
often receive the large Pell Grants and apply them to more expensive
schools. . . .
Universities learned long ago how to
capture the extra cash and adjust their price schedules accordingly.
While Pell Grants and other student aid are intended to make college
more affordable, they're contributing to the ever-higher tuition spiral.
Write 100 times on the chalkboard: Student aid raises tuition.
Last month, Mr. Obama touted the
success of Pell Grants and boasted that his Administration has expanded
the program to three million more students. But the real metric should
be how many students the program helps.
In the Pope study, the authors considered whether the grants were
helping kids get to college, stay in college and graduate. While the
grants may have contributed to a rise in college enrollment among
low-income students—to 58.9% in 2009 from 45.8% in 1970—graduation rates
for all Pell Grant recipients went in the wrong direction. According
to a 2011 National Center for Education Statistics study, overall
graduation rates were lower for students who received Pell Grants than
for those who didn't.
The one bright spot in graduation rates was for low-income grant
recipients—the ones the original program was supposed to help. The best
thing Mr. Obama could do for students, and taxpayers, is to get Pell
Grants away from being a broad entitlement and back to their core
mission of helping the poorest students."
Yes, student aid does indeed raise tuition. And increases taxpayer costs, too. Along with higher costs to service student loans as well.
And of course, more money for the colleges means higher salaries for college teachers and administrators.
When it comes to Pell Grants, all taxpayers are suckers. (Many students and parents of students are, too.)
I'm a taxpayer.
Therefore, I'm a sucker.
If you're a taxpayer, you're a sucker, too. (Unless perhaps you're taking advantage of the Pell Grant program, that is.)